13C hyperpolarized NMR by Dissolution-DNP enables snapshot detection of degradation products in lithium-ion battery electrolytes

Chloé Gioiosa (CRMN Lyon, France)

LinkedIn: @Chloé Gioiosa

Abstract: Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (dDNP) is a powerful hyperpolarization technique enabling tremendous sensitivity gains in solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Over the last decades, researchers’ efforts have led to an extension of dDNP applications in numerous research fields. Lithium-ion batteries are among the most widespread rechargeable batteries, and a proper understanding of the physicochemical reactions at stake inside them is paramount to make them safer, more efficient, and sustainable. One of the key challenges lies in better understanding and limiting the degradation of the battery electrolyte, which can significantly impact the battery’s performance. While NMR has been used in attempts to understand these mechanisms, notably by investigating the degradation products, the intrinsic lack of sensitivity of this technique, combined with the limited accessible volume of such compounds, makes its application often challenging. This work combines several state-of-the-art dDNP methodologies, including using recently introduced hyperpolarizing polymers (HYPOP) to acquire hyperpolarized 13C NMR spectra of degraded battery electrolytes. We show that we can successfully detect 13C signals on formulated battery electrolyte solutions in different degradation stages, on a 600 MHz spectrometer, with sensitivity gains of up to 3 orders of magnitude. This work paves the way for studying lithium-ion battery electrolyte degradation under usage conditions (cycling, thermal aging, air exposure…) with a 13C detection limit below the micromolar range. This methodology has the potential to provide new insights into degradation mechanisms and the role and effectiveness of additives to mitigate electrolyte degradation.

  1. KSHAMA SHARMA Avatar
    KSHAMA SHARMA

    Dear Chloe, I have 2 questions:
    1. Considering the transient nature of hyperpolarized states, what is the practical time window available for spectral acquisition? To what extent does this limit your ability to resolve and differentiate between various chemical species?
    2. In achieving the observed sensitivity enhancements, did you encounter any trade-offs in spectral resolution, such as line broadening, arising either from polarization transfer mechanisms or sample handling procedures?

    1. Chloé Gioiosa Avatar
      Chloé Gioiosa

      Dear Kshama,

      1. If we consider the shortest T1 measured on the methyl moieties of the carbonates, which is of approximately 5 seconds, you have around 10 seconds to dissolve and acquire your 90° pulse while ensuring that you see most of the carbon signals, although there is a possibility that some signals might be missing if the T1 is very short. It has already happened that some fast relaxing nuclei were missing from the spectrum. However, the fast injection system still allows us to see signals with T1 in the order of the second, but with diminished enhancements (hence why we report enhancements ranging from 100 to 1000). We also control the magnetic field during the transfer with solenoids to avoid any polarization losses due to a sudden change in the magnetic field strength.

      2. We did. We had to trade off some sensitivity enhancements to achieve a satisfying resolution by adding a “resting time” to the sequence, allowing the solution to stabilize inside the tube prior to the start of acquisition. Here, the fwhm was measured to be 3.5 Hz, and our best reported value was 1.3 Hz. We also had to deal with a lack of repeatability in the injected volume due to the significant pressure drop caused by the addition of the filter, resulting in additional losses of resolution. We are currently working on finding the best compromise to acquire a resolved spectrum with maximzed enhancement, in a repeatable manner.

      1. KSHAMA SHARMA Avatar
        KSHAMA SHARMA

        Thanks!

  2. Raj Chaklashiya Avatar

    Nice Talk! One question I have is, how do polymers like HYPOP “preserve” the polarization within them for use in DNP? I find these materials to be very interesting and am wondering how they work and whether they are compatible with other radicals (e.g. metal-based radicals like Gd-DOTA).

    1. Chloé Gioiosa Avatar
      Chloé Gioiosa

      Hello! Thank you for your question.

      In our case, the polymer is synthesized in a manner that allows the radicals (amino-TEMPO) to be grafted and incorporated within the polymer network. The polymer is therefore filled with radicals. Another important aspect is that it is a high-porosity polymer (up to 80%), which enables us to impregnate the polymer with the solution to hyperpolarize. Then, by shining microwaves on the impregnated powder, you can perform DNP in the same fashion as with a DNP juice.

      They can be synthesized with any radicals that :
      1. Contains a primary or secondary amine group
      2. Can survive at 100°C for 24h (curing process)

      If you want more details on the synthesis, you can go check this paper in which it is described : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24279-2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *